sofiaviolet: drawing of three violets and three leaves (Default)
  • [personal profile] oursin: More about money, extravagance, frivolity etc
    Such is the power of a-synchronicity, that it was only after making yesterday evening's post that I picked up Katharine Whitehorn's Only on Sundays, which of course fell open at the essay 'As Rich As You Feel', the vague memory of which lay behind much of my thinking in that post.
  • [personal profile] thingswithwings: while waiting for pain to subside, I wrote this post
    But the thing that really thrills me is seeing people get more and more efficient and matter-of-fact about their content notes, especially the content notes that are providing a warning for potentially triggering content. I don't credit kink bingo with this, but rather a shift in fandom thinking at large: I see more and more notes for things like forced feeding, self-harm, characters expressing racist sentiments, parental abuse, and all sorts of things - a range of things that reflects the broad manner in which people are beginning to think about how their story/artpiece might be read/viewed by someone with different life experiences than the writer's or artist's own. It feels to me, subjectively of course, that people in my fannish community are more and more willing to be upfront about what their story/artpiece contains, in order to provide the best possible information to potential readers. And that upfrontness, more importantly, is an indication of self-acceptance that I find extremely exciting and refreshing.
  • [personal profile] eruthros: some useful things on the internet
    1. Are you, too, frustrated by the new lj facebook and twitter connect buttons under your comments? Fear not, for not one but two people have made magical solutions! Do not mess with tab order or people shall make greasemonkey scripts, lj.
  • [personal profile] emceeaich: (no subject)
    The rest of the web is not the walled garden, Facebook is the walled garden, with a manifest destiny complex.
  • [personal profile] zulu: *flails* I just DON'T EVEN KNOW, livejournal. I JUST DON'T.
    Not to mention people could be automatically crossposting their comments to any post you made. Triangulation is suddenly that much simpler for stalkers, abusive exes, and potential or current employers. Any work you've put in to keep your fandom presence separate from your real life or professional presence is suddenly tissue paper where once it was at least nice sturdy cardstock. Feedback on your latest PWP that says "Fuck, you write hot man-on-man action, I totally got off to that," could end up side-by-side with your grandma's cookie recipe.
sofiaviolet: MS Paint person sadfacing while holding broom, with text: "clean *all* the things?" (clean all the things?)

And by that, I mean I Organized All The Books. Next step is to get them into LibraryThing.

Ellie suggests that the best place to hole up during the zombie apocalypse is a strip mall with a home improvement store and a Super WalMart that share an interior wall. Then you have materials for fortifications from the home improvement store, plus food and guns from WalMart. Just knock a hole through the interior wall and you're golden.

But if you have to choose, pick the WalMart and use random merchandise to block the doors. Ellie suggests filling shopping carts with slashed-open diapers and watering them to create a kind of sandbag thing.

links on art, accessibility, fandom secrets, site culture, and podfic )
sofiaviolet: MS Paint person with fist raised, with text: "<strong>fight all the oppressions!</strong>" (fight all the oppressions!)
[personal profile] thingswithwings: some things to think about in this VVC discussion
The links in this post will almost invariably go to posts and comments that contain (or are right next to) a lot of ablism, cissexism, dismissal of peoples' disabilities, and general dismissal of social justice efforts. If you're feeling worn out by this conversation or unable to look at any more posts/comments of that nature, my recommendation is not to click. And not to read this post, perhaps. In addition to discussion of that stuff, this post also contains discussion of triggers for things like rape and violence. If you've run out of spoons for this debate, please scroll on by: I completely understand if you don't feel up to reading this. Especially as it's rather extravagantly tl;dr.

further excerpts and my thoughts on them )
sofiaviolet: a cracked egg with bandaids holding it together (cracked)
I don't write fic, so my personal warnings policy is kind of pointless.

But I do write fiction not immediately traceable to a source canon, and my current publishing plan should I ever actually finish anything is "on my website with a virtual tip jar" - you bet your ass I'm warning for shit, because that's the standard of the community that taught me to write and to love writing.

I don't write rape scenes - I can't bring myself to do it and I don't really want to anyway. But in the story I'm working on right now, two characters discuss and enact a rape fantasy in a minimally skeevy way,* and I have restructured the story such that a reader could skip that entire section and only miss out on a bit of character development.

My purposes in writing that scene are:
1. examine my own issues with rape fantasies, based on my personal history,
2. emotionally affect readers who choose to read that scene without causing them harm,
3. demonstrate the characters' trust and ability to communicate,
4. possibly comment upon noncon/dubcon tropes - depends on how the scene goes and how meta I get.

* Potentially triggering footnote about my past abusive relationship and rape. )

***

[livejournal.com profile] kalpurna: ways to hide your warnings, if you're worried about spoilers
[livejournal.com profile] blackboggart: on artistic integrity and artistic responsibility

tangential to the warnings issue: terminology
[livejournal.com profile] were_lemur: discussing terminology: rape/non-con/dub-con
[personal profile] solarcat: defining dub-con and non-con, also available on LiveJournal. Comments and good discussion on both entries.

I'm so used to encountering the terms "non-con" and "dub-con" in fandom that I don't have any trouble parsing them in fannish contexts like headers. But I do find them troubling - each term is vague enough to encompass a pretty huge range of situations (see above links), and I don't like the way they tend to sanitize rape-in-fiction. I don't dislike it enough to get very upset about it, though.

April 2014

S M T W T F S
  123 45
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

txtbx

Not nice, but friendly.

Syndicate

RSS Atom