Quick question, internets!
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 14:26Which sounds more correct?
I am hoping my professor was trying to correct it to "she was" and just forgot to write in half of it. "She was," btw, will be my compromise between his wtaf correction and my increasingly-acceptable original.
But he was only as tall as her, and prone to slouching.
But he was only as tall as she, and prone to slouching.
I am hoping my professor was trying to correct it to "she was" and just forgot to write in half of it. "She was," btw, will be my compromise between his wtaf correction and my increasingly-acceptable original.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 18:46 (UTC)It sounds pretty awful to say "...as tall as I/he" alone, you REALLY need that "was". "She" sounds better alone than the other two, for some reason, which is why this is tricky.
Can I ask what the preceding sentence is?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 18:47 (UTC)She was is an okay compromise, I guess, but the "was" isn't necessary.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 18:47 (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 19:03 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 19:09 (UTC)No matter what other decoration you add, you're still using him as the subject and her as the object.
Also, the comma after her is technically unnecessary as "prone to slouching" is a dependent clause relating back to "he was"
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 19:18 (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 20:38 (UTC)Which is a roundabout way of saying I prefer the first.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: