You're right about that. Certainly, the implied scope of the piece means that trans women should be included.
Which forces me to narrow my reading, from "this is a post about policing women" to "this is a post about policing women who face relatively little risk of being ejected from the Woman category," from "Who counts? Everyone!" to "Doing It Wrong? No, everyone* is Doing It Right!"
Cis women can pretty much count on being considered women, even if they are then judged to be Doing It Wrong. Trans women can't count on that; they'll face scrutiny of their identity first, and then, only if they pass that test, will they be judged as women.
no subject
Which forces me to narrow my reading, from "this is a post about policing women" to "this is a post about policing women who face relatively little risk of being ejected from the Woman category," from "Who counts? Everyone!" to "Doing It Wrong? No, everyone* is Doing It Right!"
Cis women can pretty much count on being considered women, even if they are then judged to be Doing It Wrong. Trans women can't count on that; they'll face scrutiny of their identity first, and then, only if they pass that test, will they be judged as women.
* Where "everyone" means "cis women."